User talk:Gherghel

From AmwayWiki
Revision as of 06:52, 15 September 2012 by SP75 (Talk | contribs) (Patrick & Joyce: new section)

Jump to: navigation, search

Hi, Thanks for your contributions! I think the main page looks better with the active LOAs listed, don't you? --IBOFightback 22:42, 9 September 2012 (EEST)

If the same information is in more than one place, it is difficult to keep it accurate and updated in two ore more locations. I suggest to fill the space with something else. The main page should be like a site map with many links and not with too much information. Conclusion: It is redundant to keep it accurate and updated in two ore more locations. Finally, it's up to you to decide.--Gherghel 19:22, 11 September 2012 (EEST)

LOAs are something people are specifically interested in but won't necessarily know about by names like LOA or PDP or such. So yes, I think the active LOAs should remain listed on the front page unless there's too many of them. Makes it easier to find for prospects. --IBOFightback 10:11, 10 September 2012 (EEST)

Pin vs "Pin level"

Changing the template from pin to pin level has "broken" the pages for every Diamond and above page. Changing it back will break it for all the pages where you've changed it. Any particular reason you changed it?--IBOFightback 10:18, 10 September 2012 (EEST)

There is a distinction between pin and pin level but it is not essential. I'll do me best. If I make mistakes it is not on purpose. Thanks for supervising me.--Gherghel 19:26, 11 September 2012 (EEST)

By which you mean "pin level" as currently qualifying? No way to confirm that for most IBOs, so pin (highest level) is what we're left with. By the way, when leaving comments in talk, it's great if you click the second button from the right to leave a signature at the end. --IBOFightback 14:39, 11 September 2012 (EEST)

Patrick & Joyce

Hi, any reason for changing the format of Chronology of Achievements? We are trying to keep it as accurate as we can, so please don't delete the months of qualifications. Also, the current format is in accordance with other Diamond's pages, so changing it here means that we would have to change it for every Diamond where the chronology is available. This would require a lot of effort without providing any new information.--SP75 09:52, 15 September 2012 (EEST)