Difference between revisions of "Talk:Crown Ambassador"
From AmwayWiki
DiamondABO (Talk | contribs) |
IBOFightback (Talk | contribs) (→Founders: keep FCA or not?) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Its better to have all CA's and up one one side. You can separate them in the [[Category]]. | Its better to have all CA's and up one one side. You can separate them in the [[Category]]. | ||
Best wishes for 2008 !! --[[User:DiamondABO]] | Best wishes for 2008 !! --[[User:DiamondABO]] | ||
| + | : I disagree, FCA and CA are separate pins and separate recognitions and there is an increasingly large number of both. Having them listed multiple times means multiple updates when someone qualifies at a new level (eg FAA). Anyone elses thoughts? --[[User:IBOFightback|IBOFightback]] 09:35, 29 December 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 15:35, 29 December 2007
Korea
Geez, I love those Amway Korea success stories. Lines and lines and lines of korean translated as "you can do it!" hahahah --IBOFightback 16:38, 12 December 2007 (CST)
- Yeah, they proved that we could do it too :-)))--SP75 16:40, 12 December 2007 (CST)
Founders
should we remove Founders from this article and leave separate rather than have to update both? --IBOFightback 09:10, 18 December 2007 (CST)
Its better to have all CA's and up one one side. You can separate them in the Category. Best wishes for 2008 !! --User:DiamondABO
- I disagree, FCA and CA are separate pins and separate recognitions and there is an increasingly large number of both. Having them listed multiple times means multiple updates when someone qualifies at a new level (eg FAA). Anyone elses thoughts? --IBOFightback 09:35, 29 December 2007 (CST)
