Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zhou, Jack & Ying"
From AmwayWiki
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
they have been invited by amway to attend the founders council meeting for many times[[User:Lee sy85|Lee sy85]] | they have been invited by amway to attend the founders council meeting for many times[[User:Lee sy85|Lee sy85]] | ||
| − | :The participation in Founders Council doesn't require them to be '''Founders''' Crown Ambassadors. Crown Ambassadors and even ABOs with at least 20 FAA points are qualified for Founders Council. Given that the November 2007 issue of Because magazine said they were Crown Ambassadors, I suppose that unless they have qualified for FCA level in 2008, they are CA, not FCA. | + | :The participation in Founders Council doesn't require them to be '''Founders''' Crown Ambassadors. Crown Ambassadors and even ABOs with at least 20 FAA points are qualified for Founders Council. Given that the November 2007 issue of Because magazine said they were Crown Ambassadors, I suppose that unless they have qualified for FCA level in 2008, they are CA, not FCA.--[[User:SP75|SP75]] 12:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:45, 1 December 2008
Are they really Founders Crown Ambassadors? Back in November 2007 they were listed in Australian Because magazine as Crown Ambassadors.
ya... they are founders crown ambassador in China. they have been invited by amway to attend the founders council meeting for many timesLee sy85
- The participation in Founders Council doesn't require them to be Founders Crown Ambassadors. Crown Ambassadors and even ABOs with at least 20 FAA points are qualified for Founders Council. Given that the November 2007 issue of Because magazine said they were Crown Ambassadors, I suppose that unless they have qualified for FCA level in 2008, they are CA, not FCA.--SP75 12:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
