Difference between revisions of "Talk:Crown Ambassador"
(→China) |
(→Founders) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Best wishes for 2008 !! --[[User:DiamondABO]] | Best wishes for 2008 !! --[[User:DiamondABO]] | ||
: I disagree, FCA and CA are separate pins and separate recognitions and there is an increasingly large number of both. Having them listed multiple times means multiple updates when someone qualifies at a new level (eg FAA). Anyone elses thoughts? --[[User:IBOFightback|IBOFightback]] 09:35, 29 December 2007 (CST) | : I disagree, FCA and CA are separate pins and separate recognitions and there is an increasingly large number of both. Having them listed multiple times means multiple updates when someone qualifies at a new level (eg FAA). Anyone elses thoughts? --[[User:IBOFightback|IBOFightback]] 09:35, 29 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Its better to have all CA's and up on one page because ist "the biggest PIN" anyway. And its esier to find. And yes, you can split the category. Its better i think. | ||
Revision as of 13:40, 2 January 2008
China
Is anyone able to list all Crown Ambassadors who have achieved this qualification in China? I read an article which says that Holly Chen & Barry Chi have qualified as CAs in China (they are also DCA in Taiwan) and have 13 Chinese Crown Ambassadors in their group.
They must have more the 20 CA's in China. Their biggest Taiwanese leg in their LOS (Hsieh Sunny & Hsu Debra, FCA 55) who is not part of their LOA have also lots of CA's. They have at least 2 other CA's in Taiwan who have their own LOA too, probably with CA's in China too!
Korea
Geez, I love those Amway Korea success stories. Lines and lines and lines of korean translated as "you can do it!" hahahah --IBOFightback 16:38, 12 December 2007 (CST)
- Yeah, they proved that we could do it too :-)))--SP75 16:40, 12 December 2007 (CST)
Founders
should we remove Founders from this article and leave separate rather than have to update both? --IBOFightback 09:10, 18 December 2007 (CST)
Its better to have all CA's and up one one side. You can separate them in the Category. Best wishes for 2008 !! --User:DiamondABO
- I disagree, FCA and CA are separate pins and separate recognitions and there is an increasingly large number of both. Having them listed multiple times means multiple updates when someone qualifies at a new level (eg FAA). Anyone elses thoughts? --IBOFightback 09:35, 29 December 2007 (CST)
Its better to have all CA's and up on one page because ist "the biggest PIN" anyway. And its esier to find. And yes, you can split the category. Its better i think.
