MYTH: Amway is a Pyramid

Pyramid Schemes are illegal in virtually every country of the world, and for good reason - they are mathematically doomed to failure and are little more than a method of transferring money from a large number of people to a smaller number of people.

Examples

AirPlane Game

One example is the infamous airplane game of the 1980s. People were encouraged to buy tickets as passengers on an imaginary airplane. The plane would have 8 passengers, 4 flight attendants, 2 co-pilots, and a pilot. The Pilot would collect all the ticket money, and afterwards the 2 co-pilots would separate into 2 new planes, taking the roles of pilot, with the flight attendants becoming co-pilots, and the passengers flight attendents. The flight attendents would then be responsible for recruiting new passengers. The game would eventually "collapse" when there are no more people willing to pay their $1500 to buy a "ticket".

Product Based Pyramid Schemes

More sophisticated Pyramid Schemes operate in much the same way, except that except for a ticket on an imaginary airplane, participants receive some kind of product or service in return for the cash they put into the scheme. The products and services however, have little intrinsic worth. Participants then receive a payment for each additional person they bring in to the scheme. As the products/services are essential worthless participants do not use or consume them themselves and have no possibility to sell them to others, thus there is no way to earn money except through recruiting of others into the scheme. Eventually there weill be further people able to be recruited, and the scheme collapses.

Laws regarding Pyramid Schemes

Federal Trade Commission (United States)

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), along with individual states, is responsible for policing illegal marketing schemes in the United States.

Definition of a Pyramid Scheme

In 1998, Debra Valentine of the United States Federal Trade Commission, had the following to say about Pyramid Schemes -

Pyramid schemes now come in so many forms that they may be difficult to recognize immediately. However, they all share one overriding characteristic. They promise consumers or investors large profits based primarily on recruiting others to join their program, not based on profits from any real investment or real sale of goods to the public. Some schemes may purport to sell a product, but they often simply use the product to hide their pyramid structure. There are two tell-tale signs that a product is simply being used to disguise a pyramid scheme: inventory loading and a lack of retail sales.

In Webster vs Omnitrition, United States Court of Appeal, Ninth Circuit, had the following to say -

The Federal Trade Commission has established a test for determining what constitutes a pyramid scheme. Such contrivances are characterized by the payment by participants of money to the company in return for which they receive (1) the right to sell a product and (2) the right to receive in return for recruiting other participants into the program rewards which are unrelated to sale of the product to ultimate users.

The satisfaction of the second element of the Koscot test is the sine qua non of a pyramid scheme: "As is apparent, the presence of this second element, recruitment with rewards unrelated to product sales, is nothing more than an elaborate chain letter device in which individuals who pay a valuable consideration with the expectation of recouping it to some degree via recruitment are bound to be disappointed.

sine qua non is a legal term meaning "without which it is not". Clearly, in the United States the key feature, indeed a necessary feature of an illegal pyramid scheme is that participants receive payments when they recruit other participants.

Fair Trade Act (New Zealand)

In New Zealand, Pyramid Schemes are covered by the Fair Trading Act, which is enforced by the Commerce Commission. The Fair Trading Act - A General Guide has the following to say -

A pyramid scheme can take many forms, but has the following essential elements:

* it offers a financial return based on the payments made by new recruits;

* the return is dependent primarily on the continued recruitment of new members, not sales of a product or service.

When Multi-level Marketing first became common in the United States, many folk misinterpreted it's "recruiting" aspect to mean that money was earned through the recruiting of other people, the classic sign of a pyu